Proqo is evaluation intelligence for institutional and government procurement — AI decision support that helps procurement teams and decision-makers turn tender packs and proposals into scored, evidence-linked recommendations. Built for awards that must survive audit, challenge, and scrutiny.
What it does
One governed workspace for evaluators and panel members: criteria → comparable scores → compliance → recommendation record. Not ChatGPT tabs and spreadsheets — a defensible path from published requirements to a decision the committee can explain.
Why it wins
Illustrative: a complex evaluation can run ~225 person-hours across compliance, technical, commercial, moderation, and reporting. Target: cut decision-support load 50–70% (~2–4 working weeks) so evaluation committees and the wider team spend time on judgment. In major protest systems, unreasonable evaluation is among top sustain grounds; challengers often obtain relief including corrective action.
Illustrative · not a measured Proqo case study · committees and decision-makers still decide.
Who it’s for
Government and federal agencies · universities · health systems · enterprises and regulated buyers — and advisors supporting a client evaluation. For organisations where an indefensible award costs more than getting the record right.
The standard ahead
The evaluation intelligence layer for institutional and public procurement: human-governed AI, immutable audit trail, institution-ready reporting for procurement teams, committees, and decision-makers — category infrastructure for how serious buyers award.
What is Proqo
Proqo is evaluation intelligence for institutional and government procurement — AI decision support that helps procurement teams and decision-makers turn tender packs and proposals into scored, evidence-linked recommendations. Built for awards that must survive audit, challenge, and scrutiny.
What it does
One governed workspace for evaluators and panel members: criteria → comparable scores → compliance → recommendation record. Not ChatGPT tabs and spreadsheets — a defensible path from published requirements to a decision the committee can explain.
Why it wins
Illustrative: a complex evaluation can run ~225 person-hours across compliance, technical, commercial, moderation, and reporting. Target: cut decision-support load 50–70% (~2–4 working weeks) so evaluation committees and the wider team spend time on judgment. In major protest systems, unreasonable evaluation is among top sustain grounds; challengers often obtain relief including corrective action.
Illustrative · not a measured Proqo case study · committees and decision-makers still decide.
Who it’s for
Government and federal agencies · universities · health systems · enterprises and regulated buyers — and advisors supporting a client evaluation. For organisations where an indefensible award costs more than getting the record right.
The standard ahead
The evaluation intelligence layer for institutional and public procurement: human-governed AI, immutable audit trail, institution-ready reporting for procurement teams, committees, and decision-makers — category infrastructure for how serious buyers award.